Mills v. Blackburn
This text of 274 F. App'x 563 (Mills v. Blackburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal without prejudice for failure to identify a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction in the first amended complaint.
The Clerk shall file the motions to reinstate the appeal, received on January 22, 2008 and April 1, 2008. The motions to reinstate the appeal are granted. The court’s December 31, 2007 order is vacated.
The court has reviewed the record, the opening brief, and the response to the court’s November 15, 2007 order to show cause. This review shows that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 F. App'x 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-blackburn-ca9-2008.