Mills v. Bell

Fourth Circuit

Mills v. Bell

17 F. App'x 178

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2001·No. 01-6519·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Leon Mills appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accept *179 ing the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Bell, No. CA-00-986-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Leon Mills appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accept *179 ing the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Bell, No. CA-00-986-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Mills v. Bell, 17 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

17 F. App'x 178 (Mills v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related