Mills v. Baune
This text of 8 R.I. Dec. 88 (Mills v. Baune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Heard upon petition to discontinue payments to respondent.
Joseph C. Johnston, the physician appointed by the Court to examine respondent, made a thorough examination and his report is on file in the case. In this report he says:
“In my opinion there is a tinge of malingering to her complaints, as the physical findings are negative. There is no evidence at this time to show that she received any injury to her knees.”
Murray S. Danforth, M. D., also examined respondent and testified to much the same effect.
Respondent testified, and the Court is satisfied from all the testimony that payments should be discontinued.
A decree may be entered discontinuing further payments from March 11, 1931.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 R.I. Dec. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-baune-risuperct-1931.