Mills v. Baizley
34 A. 1134, 57 N.J.L. 711, 28 Vroom 711, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 38
This text of 34 A. 1134 (Mills v. Baizley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mills v. Baizley, 34 A. 1134, 57 N.J.L. 711, 28 Vroom 711, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 38 (N.J. 1895).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Gummere, Magie, Réed, Yan Syckel, Sims; 6.
For reversal — Dixon, Lippincott, Bogert, Brown. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 A. 1134, 57 N.J.L. 711, 28 Vroom 711, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-baizley-nj-1895.