Mills-Tel Corp. v. Kattour, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mills-Tel Corp. v. Kattour, Inc.

143 So. 3d 939, 2014 WL 1809775, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6784

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-885

StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 3d 939 (Mills-Tel Corp. v. Kattour, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills-Tel Corp. v. Kattour, Inc., 143 So. 3d 939, 2014 WL 1809775, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

FERNANDEZ, J.

Mills-Tel Corp., etc., appeals the trial court’s final judgment entered in favor of Kattour, Inc., etc., and Foods of South Florida, Inc. (collectively, “Kattour”), as well as the trial court’s final order awarding Kattour attorney’s fees and costs against Mills-Tel. We affirm the final judgment, but reverse the award of attor[940]*940ney’s fees. Kattour concedes on appeal that the final judgment erroneously awarded attorney’s fees that included attorney time which predated the proposal for settlement service date. We thus reverse the award and remand to the trial court for entry of an amended final judgment after the trial court calculates attorney’s fees from the date of service of the proposal for settlement to the conclusion of the case.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FERNANDEZ, J.

Mills-Tel Corp., etc., appeals the trial court’s final judgment entered in favor of Kattour, Inc., etc., and Foods of South Florida, Inc. (collectively, “Kattour”), as well as the trial court’s final order awarding Kattour attorney’s fees and costs against Mills-Tel. We affirm the final judgment, but reverse the award of attor[940]*940ney’s fees. Kattour concedes on appeal that the final judgment erroneously awarded attorney’s fees that included attorney time which predated the proposal for settlement service date. We thus reverse the award and remand to the trial court for entry of an amended final judgment after the trial court calculates attorney’s fees from the date of service of the proposal for settlement to the conclusion of the case.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 So. 3d 939, 2014 WL 1809775, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-tel-corp-v-kattour-inc-fladistctapp-2014.