Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Millonzi v. Perram Electric, Inc.

Millonzi v. Perram Electric, Inc.

100 Ohio St. 3d 67
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 8, 2003
DocketNos. 2003-0321 and 2003-0324
StatusPublished

This text of 100 Ohio St. 3d 67 (Millonzi v. Perram Electric, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millonzi v. Perram Electric, Inc., 100 Ohio St. 3d 67 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

{¶ 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is summarily reversed on the authority of Hooten v. Safe Auto. Ins. Co., 100 Ohio St.3d 8, 2003-Ohio-4829, 795 N.E.2d 648. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hooten v. Safe Auto Insurance
100 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Ohio St. 3d 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millonzi-v-perram-electric-inc-ohio-2003.