Home/New York Supreme Court/Millon v. Salisbury

Millon v. Salisbury

13 Johns. 211
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 13 Johns. 211 (Millon v. Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millon v. Salisbury, 13 Johns. 211 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Millón being a bailee for hire, and chargeable with no ill treatment, and having employed the horse to no other-use than that which was expressly agreed on, and paid for, he is not liable for such an injury as the plaintiff below complains’ pf-

As to all accidents naturally incident to the use of the horse, in the manner contracted for, the law imposes the risk on the bailor. Injustice has been done, and the judgment ought to he reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Klein
52 Misc. 123 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Taylor v. Downey
29 L.R.A. 92 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Stewart v. Western Union R. Co.
23 F. Cas. 76 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1869)
Hard v. Nearing
44 Barb. 472 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
Conwell v. Smith
8 Ind. 530 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1857)
Mayor of Columbus v. Howard
6 Ga. 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1849)
Harrington v. Snyder
3 Barb. 380 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millon-v-salisbury-nysupct-1816.