Millner v. Hampshire

126 So. 776, 99 Fla. 389
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 25, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Ellis are of the *390 opinion, that the decree of the circuit court should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed. Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be, and the same is, on authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Millner v. Hampshire, 126 So. 776, 99 Fla. 389 (Fla. 1930).

126 So. 776 (Millner v. Hampshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)