Millner v. Hampshire

126 So. 776, 99 Fla. 389
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 25, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 776 (Millner v. Hampshire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millner v. Hampshire, 126 So. 776, 99 Fla. 389 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Ellis are of the *390 opinion, that the decree of the circuit court should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed. Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be, and the same is, on authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 776, 99 Fla. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millner-v-hampshire-fla-1930.