Millisa Nikitas, Jeremey Sessoms v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.; PAR, Inc. d/b/a PAR North America; and C G Asset Recovery, Inc.

Opinion

2 4 6 9 MILLISA NIKITAS, JEREMEY SESSOMS, Case No. 2:26-cv-0162 1-GMN-NJK 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 11 Vv. TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 12 CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.; PAR, INC. d/b/a PAR NORTH 13 AMERICA; and C G ASSET RECOVERY, INC.; 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 I]. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in the District of Nevada, alleging, inter alia, that Defendant 19 breached the peace by repossession of Plaintiffs’ vehicle in violation of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.9606 20 the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (the “FDCPA”), and conversion. 21 Given the allegations made and the claims asserted, Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores 22 Inc. and PAR, Inc., d/b/a/ PAR North America (“Defendants”), require additional time t 23 determine how they intend to respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants request 24 additional time up to and including August 6, 2026, to prepare responses to the Complaint. 25 Counsel for Defendants contacted counsel for Plaintiffs who consents to the relief requestec 26 herein. 27 28

1 Il. STANDARD 2 Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[w]hen an act may or must b 3 done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time....” Fed. R. Civ. F 4 6(b)(1). “‘Good cause’ is understood to mean ‘[a] legally sufficient reason,’ and it reflects ‘the burde: 5 placed on a litigant (usu. by court rule or order) to show why a request should be granted or an □□□□□□ 6 excused.’” Joseph v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 651 F.3d 348, 355 Gd Cir. 2011) (quoting Black 7 Law Dictionary 251 (9th ed. 2009)). 8 Il. ARGUMENT 9 Defendants submit that good cause for an extension exists here. First, this litigation is in it 10 infancy. As a result, Defendants submit that additional time to respond to the Complaint will resul 11. minimal prejudice to the parties. Additionally, good cause exists as, in the process of reviewing th 12 \allegations made against it, Defendant now believes that it may be able to move to dismiss th 13 Complaint on the merits. Exploring further and potentially briefing a motion to dismiss will requir 14 additional time and resources. Defendant requests additional time to prepare and file its responsiv: 15 pleading. 17 For the reasons above, Defendants respectfully submit that good cause exists for this Cour 18 to grant them an extension of time, up to and including August 6, 2026, to respond to Plaintiffs 19 Complaint. 20 DATED this 23" day of June, 2026. 21 ITIS SO ORDERED 7 Dated: June 24, 2026

Nancy J. Koppe: 25 ) United States N agistrate Judge

27 28