Million v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Million v. Wright

1992 OK 75, 831 P.2d 651, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 112, 1992 WL 110312

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 26, 1992

DocketNo. 79425

StatusPublished

This text of 1992 OK 75 (Million v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Million v. Wright, 1992 OK 75, 831 P.2d 651, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 112, 1992 WL 110312 (Okla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed. The order setting bond at $3,000 cash or $6,000 surety is set aside. Writ shall issue prohibiting the respondent, the Honorable Thornton Wright, District Judge, District Court of Oklahoma County, or any other judge assigned to case numbered FD-91-2348, from conditioning the petitioner’s signature bond release on his waiver of a jury trial. The trial court shall, in its discretion, set bond for petitioner’s appearance at such trial, or make such other arrangement to secure his appearance as may be permitted under Okla.Stat. tit. 21, § 567 (Supp.1990), and Terry v. Gassett, 740 P.2d 141 (Okla.1987).

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 26th DAY OF MAY 1992.

HODGES, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. ALMA WILSON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed. The order setting bond at $3,000 cash or $6,000 surety is set aside. Writ shall issue prohibiting the respondent, the Honorable Thornton Wright, District Judge, District Court of Oklahoma County, or any other judge assigned to case numbered FD-91-2348, from conditioning the petitioner’s signature bond release on his waiver of a jury trial. The trial court shall, in its discretion, set bond for petitioner’s appearance at such trial, or make such other arrangement to secure his appearance as may be permitted under Okla.Stat. tit. 21, § 567 (Supp.1990), and Terry v. Gassett, 740 P.2d 141 (Okla.1987).

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 26th DAY OF MAY 1992.

HODGES, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. ALMA WILSON, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1992 OK 75, 831 P.2d 651, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 112, 1992 WL 110312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/million-v-wright-okla-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack