Million v. People

Appellate Court of Illinois

Million v. People

6 Ill. App. 537, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 134

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 2, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Ill. App. 537 (Million v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Million v. People, 6 Ill. App. 537, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 134 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted for an assault upon one Frank Blackburn with intent to commit murder. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of an assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of Edward Blackburn, when no considerable prevocation appeared. Hpon this verdict a judgment of conviction was entered and a fine inflicted upon plaintiff in error and he was ordered to stand committed until the fine and costs should be paid. We have examined the briefs filed on the part of The People under leave of the court this day granted, as well as those for plaintiff in error, and although numerous errors are assigned and discussed, we deem it unnecessary to notice any of them except that which asks a reversal on account of the variance between the indictment and the verdict in the name of the person assaulted.

This variance we regard as fatal to the judgment, and it must be reversed and a new trial awarded. 1 Whart. Crim. Law, 256-8.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted for an assault upon one Frank Blackburn with intent to commit murder. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of an assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of Edward Blackburn, when no considerable prevocation appeared. Hpon this verdict a judgment of conviction was entered and a fine inflicted upon plaintiff in error and he was ordered to stand committed until the fine and costs should be paid. We have examined the briefs filed on the part of The People under leave of the court this day granted, as well as those for plaintiff in error, and although numerous errors are assigned and discussed, we deem it unnecessary to notice any of them except that which asks a reversal on account of the variance between the indictment and the verdict in the name of the person assaulted.

This variance we regard as fatal to the judgment, and it must be reversed and a new trial awarded. 1 Whart. Crim. Law, 256-8.

Beversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ill. App. 537, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/million-v-people-illappct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack