Millinocket School Committee v. Millinocket Teachers Ass'n

390 A.2d 1106, 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 183, 1978 Me. LEXIS 827
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 1, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 390 A.2d 1106 (Millinocket School Committee v. Millinocket Teachers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millinocket School Committee v. Millinocket Teachers Ass'n, 390 A.2d 1106, 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 183, 1978 Me. LEXIS 827 (Me. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Millinocket School Committee and Milli-nocket Teachers Association had negotiated and, ultimately, entered into interest arbitration pursuant to 26 M.R.S.A. § 961-973 (Municipal Public Employees Labor Relations Law) in an effort to resolve whether loss of salary due to pregnancy should be compensable as sick leave. The arbitrators determined that temporary disability resulting from pregnancy and childbirth was to be treated “as any other temporary disability for all job related purposes,” and that the contract of employment should so provide.1 In a review authorized by 26 M.R. S.A. § 967, through the medium of a Rule 80B complaint, the Superior Court affirmed the decision of the arbitrators and the plaintiff has appealed. See Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. # 5 v. M. S. A. D. # 5 Teach. Ass’n, Me., 324 A.2d 308 (1974).

In Murray v. Waterville Board of Education, Me., 390 A .2d 516, 519 (1978), we construed the term “sick leave” in 20 M.R.S. § 1951 to include “as a mandatory benefit to which teachers are entitled as a matter of right, a temporary medical disability associated with pregnancy.” It is now clear that pregnancy related disability is compen-sable as sick leave, not because of a contract between the parties, but because the statute mandates it. There is no occasion to engage in interest arbitration on an issue the parameters of which are governed by a statute.

Our decision in Murray, supra, has rendered moot the issue raised by the instant appeal.

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

[1107]*1107Remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DELAHANTY, J., did not sit. POMEROY, WERNICK, GODFREY and NICHOLS, JJ., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 A.2d 1106, 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 183, 1978 Me. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millinocket-school-committee-v-millinocket-teachers-assn-me-1978.