Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K.
This text of Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K. (Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
lN THE SUPRE|VlE COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA |V||DDLE DlSTRlCT
SA|V|UEL W.B. |V|{LL|NGHAUSEN, l|I, ! NO. 81 |V||\/| 2014
Petitioner
KAREN IV|. DRAKE, JOY A. CAPKA, |V|ARYANN D|RENZO, ROBERT L. HYSLOP, JR., THERESA |VI. HYSLOP, JOHN DOES '|-4, AND XYZ CORP.,
Respondents
PER CUR|AN| AND NOW, this 11"‘ clay of August, 2014, the Petition for Leave to Fi|e Petition for A||owance of Appea| Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Petitioner is directed to file his
Petition for A||owance of Appea| within 15 days of our orc|er.
IV|r. Justioe Stevens would deny the Petition for Leave to Fi|e Petitiori for A||owance of Appea| Nunc Pro Tunc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millingshausen-s-v-drake-k-pa-2014.