Milliner v. State
This text of 284 So. 2d 231 (Milliner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Milliner appeals an order denying his re-application for hearing of a motion to vacate sentence under R.Cr.P. 3.850, 33 F. S.A., in which he alleged that his direct appeal had been frustrated by his lack of knowledge of appellate procedure and by his psychiatric instability.
The proper method for raising the issue of deprivation of direct appeal is by petition for writ of habeas corpus. Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239; State v. Wooden, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 755; Saunders v. Wainwright, Fla.1971, 254 So.2d 197.
The order appealed is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 So. 2d 231, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milliner-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.