Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.

First Circuit

Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.

10 F.2d 973, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2312

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 1926

DocketNo. 1825

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F.2d 973 (Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 10 F.2d 973, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2312 (1st Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BREWSTER, District Judge.

A petition for rehearing has been filed in this ease by the plaintiff in error, presenting nine distinct grounds upon which the petition is based. Each of these grounds presents a question which was fully discussed in the opinion of this court handed down November 25, 1925.

A consideration of the petition reveals no new matter, nor any errors of sufficient moment to induce a majority of the court to alter or modify any conclusion reached.

In view of such a situation, it seems unnecessary to now deal with or grant a rehearing for .the purpose of further considering the many ramifications of the case, which the petition for rehearing involves.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BREWSTER, District Judge.

A petition for rehearing has been filed in this ease by the plaintiff in error, presenting nine distinct grounds upon which the petition is based. Each of these grounds presents a question which was fully discussed in the opinion of this court handed down November 25, 1925.

A consideration of the petition reveals no new matter, nor any errors of sufficient moment to induce a majority of the court to alter or modify any conclusion reached.

In view of such a situation, it seems unnecessary to now deal with or grant a rehearing for .the purpose of further considering the many ramifications of the case, which the petition for rehearing involves.

Petition denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F.2d 973, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milliken-tomlinson-co-v-american-sugar-refining-co-ca1-1926.