Home/First Circuit/Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.

Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.

10 F.2d 973, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 F.2d 809 →
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 16, 1926·No. No. 1825·Published

Opinion

BREWSTER, District Judge.

A petition for rehearing has been filed in this ease by the plaintiff in error, presenting nine distinct grounds upon which the petition is based. Each of these grounds presents a question which was fully discussed in the opinion of this court handed down November 25, 1925.

A consideration of the petition reveals no new matter, nor any errors of sufficient moment to induce a majority of the court to alter or modify any conclusion reached.

In view of such a situation, it seems unnecessary to now deal with or grant a rehearing for .the purpose of further considering the many ramifications of the case, which the petition for rehearing involves.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 10 F.2d 973, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2312 (1st Cir. 1926).

10 F.2d 973 (Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.