Millikan v. GUILFORD MILLS INC.
This text of 325 S.E.2d 631 (Millikan v. GUILFORD MILLS INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lloyd E. MILLIKAN
v.
GUILFORD MILLS, INC., Ransone & Son Plumbing, Inc., David C. Murray, Individually and t/a Murray Crane Service and Robert H. Ransone, Individually and t/a and d/b/a Ransone & Son Plumbing.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
*632 Benjamin D. Haines, Greensboro, for plaintiff.
Nichols, Caffrey, Hill, Evans & Murrelle, Greensboro, for defendants (Guilford Mills).
Perry C. Henson, Jack B. Bayliss, Jr., Greensboro, for defendants (Murray & Crane).
Tuggle, Duggins, Meschan & Elrod, Greensboro, for defendants (Ransone).
Plaintiff's petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 S.E.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millikan-v-guilford-mills-inc-nc-1985.