Milligan v. Robinson
This text of 58 How. Pr. 380 (Milligan v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[381]*381The defendants succeeded and the referee ordered a dismissal of the complaint, with costs to defendants. The defendants appeared by separate attorneys and each taxed a separate bill of costs. An appeal was taken from such taxation by plaintiff, and judge ISToxon, at Syracuse special term, December 9, 1879, granted the motion striking out defendants’ costs, and only allowing one bill to both defendants, plaintiff citing section 1022, new Code. From these orders defendants appealed to general term at Syracuse, January 6, 1880, which reversed the orders of the special term and granted defendants separate bills of costs, defendants citing 29 Sowa/rd, 90.
P. H. McJEkoy, for defendant Eobinson.
G. W. Smith, for defendant, Eoof.
C. J. Palmer, for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 How. Pr. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milligan-v-robinson-nysupct-1880.