Milligan v. Fortson

54 S.E. 915, 126 Ga. 15, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 301
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 27, 1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

The undisputed evidence in the cáse required a finding that the respondent was a resident of the third ward in the city of Augusta at the time of his election, and that he had his domicile there; and further, that he had not done any act to change either his legal residence or domicile. The court did not err in denying and dismissing the petition of the plaintiffs for leave to file pleadings in the nature of a quo warranto.

■Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent. The case came to the Supreme Court upon exceptions of the plaintiffs to the dismissal of their application. Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming, for plaintiffs. Lamar & Callaway and G. Henry Cohen, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milligan v. Fortson, 54 S.E. 915, 126 Ga. 15, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 301 (Ga. 1906).

54 S.E. 915 (Milligan v. Fortson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Hammock
184 S.E.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Croop v. Walton
157 N.E. 275 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1927)