Milligan v. Fles
This text of 21 Abb. N. Cas. 93 (Milligan v. Fles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where either the plaintiff or defendant does not reside within the City of New York a short summons may be ordered (Code Civ. Pro. 3165). The fact that either or both have an office or place of business within the-county, does not affect this provision of the Code. A place of business within the county exempts a plaintiff from the-the necessity of giving security for costs as a non-resident, under sections 3968 and 3969 of the Code (§ 3160), and exempts a defendant from being proceeded against by-attachment as a non resident of the county (Code, § 3969,. subd. 3), but the exemption does not extend to or affect the short summons authorized by section 3165 (supra).
The motion by the defendant to vacate the order directing a short summons to issue will therefore be denied, with $10 costs to abide the event.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Abb. N. Cas. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milligan-v-fles-nysupct-1888.