Milligan v. Browarsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Milligan v. Browarsky

23 A. 398, 147 Pa. 155, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 798

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 4, 1892

DocketAppeal No. 106

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A. 398 (Milligan v. Browarsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milligan v. Browarsky, 23 A. 398, 147 Pa. 155, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 798 (Pa. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This record is free from error. The offer of evidence referred to in the first specification was properly rejected. The suit before the alderman was for a different cause of action. The one was for the beer sold and delivered, the other was for the empty barrels. The attempt to use the record of the alderman as a bar to this suit was evidently an afterthought, as no reference was made to it in the affidavit of defence. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This record is free from error. The offer of evidence referred to in the first specification was properly rejected. The suit before the alderman was for a different cause of action. The one was for the beer sold and delivered, the other was for the empty barrels. The attempt to use the record of the alderman as a bar to this suit was evidently an afterthought, as no reference was made to it in the affidavit of defence. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A. 398, 147 Pa. 155, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milligan-v-browarsky-pa-1892.