Milligan v. Allied Builders, Inc.

34 A.D.3d 1268, 824 N.Y.S.2d 524
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 34 A.D.3d 1268 (Milligan v. Allied Builders, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milligan v. Allied Builders, Inc., 34 A.D.3d 1268, 824 N.Y.S.2d 524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered January 10, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, that part of the motion with respect to the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim is granted and that claim is dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries incurred when he tripped over the uneven planking of a scaffold and fell to one knee. It is undisputed that plaintiff did not fall from the scaffold. Supreme Court erred in denying that part of defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Defendants met their initial burden on the motion by establishing that plaintiff was not injured while falling from, or attempting to prevent himself from falling from, the scaffold (cf. Striegel v Hillcrest Hgts. Dev. Corp., 100 NY2d 974 [2003]; Franklin v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 291 AD2d 854 [2002]; Ray v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 256 AD2d 1070, 1071 [1998]; Adams v North-Star Constr. Co., 249 AD2d 1001 [1998]; Brown v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 188 AD2d 1014 [1992]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Present— Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Scudder, Gorski and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
5 F. Supp. 3d 452 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Rigby v. Brisky Family Ltd. Partnership
64 A.D.3d 1169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Peters v. Kissling Interests, Inc.
63 A.D.3d 1519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
DiPasquale v. M.J. Ogiony Builders, Inc.
60 A.D.3d 1338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Auchampaugh v. Syracuse University
57 A.D.3d 1291 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Favreau v. Barnett & Barnett, LLC
47 A.D.3d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.3d 1268, 824 N.Y.S.2d 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milligan-v-allied-builders-inc-nyappdiv-2006.