Millick v. Peterson
17 F. Cas. 375, 2 Wash. C. C. 31
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1807·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
expressed an opinion, that better evidence could be given of the payment of the premium. That inferior evidence ought not to be left to the jury, when it appeared that there existed better in the power of the plaintiff. If he has paid the note he gave for the premium, he ought to produce it, or prove it to have been paid by other evidence. But on recommendation of the court, a juror was withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Millick v. Peterson, 17 F. Cas. 375, 2 Wash. C. C. 31 (circtdpa 1807).
17 F. Cas. 375 (Millick v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barron v. Mason
31 Vt. 189 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1858)