Millick v. Peterson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Millick v. Peterson

17 F. Cas. 375, 2 Wash. C. C. 31

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 15, 1807

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 F. Cas. 375 (Millick v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Millick v. Peterson, 17 F. Cas. 375, 2 Wash. C. C. 31 (circtdpa 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

expressed an opinion, that better evidence could be given of the payment of the premium. That inferior evidence ought not to be left to the jury, when it appeared that there existed better in the power of the plaintiff. If he has paid the note he gave for the premium, he ought to produce it, or prove it to have been paid by other evidence. But on recommendation of the court, a juror was withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

expressed an opinion, that better evidence could be given of the payment of the premium. That inferior evidence ought not to be left to the jury, when it appeared that there existed better in the power of the plaintiff. If he has paid the note he gave for the premium, he ought to produce it, or prove it to have been paid by other evidence. But on recommendation of the court, a juror was withdrawn.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 F. Cas. 375, 2 Wash. C. C. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millick-v-peterson-circtdpa-1807.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack