Millican v. State

167 S.E. 212, 46 Ga. App. 218, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 114
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 24, 1932
Docket22737
StatusPublished

This text of 167 S.E. 212 (Millican v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millican v. State, 167 S.E. 212, 46 Ga. App. 218, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 114 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Bboyles, O. J.

The evidence in this case authorized the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis except that of the defendant’s guilt of the offense charged (possessing whisky); and the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds only, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Eooper and MacIntyre, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 212, 46 Ga. App. 218, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millican-v-state-gactapp-1932.