Millhouse v. Zickefoose

Supreme Court

Millhouse v. Zickefoose

181 L. Ed. 2d 252, 132 S. Ct. 440, 565 U.S. 939, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7211, 80 U.S.L.W. 3219

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 11, 2011

DocketNo. 11-6303

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 252 (Millhouse v. Zickefoose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Millhouse v. Zickefoose, 181 L. Ed. 2d 252, 132 S. Ct. 440, 565 U.S. 939, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7211, 80 U.S.L.W. 3219 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 94.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 94.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 L. Ed. 2d 252, 132 S. Ct. 440, 565 U.S. 939, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7211, 80 U.S.L.W. 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millhouse-v-zickefoose-scotus-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack