Millette v. State

176 So. 3d 1287, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16150, 2015 WL 6620177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Millette v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15854
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2015·No. 2D14-5678·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reynaldo Millette appeals the postcon-viction court’s order dismissing as untimely his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the court improperly dismissed Millette’s second amended motion filed on May 23, 2013, we reverse and remand for the court to reconsider Millette’s claims-none of which were determined on the merits or refuted by the record. See Millette v. State, 148 So.3d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also Rosier v. State, 144 So.3d 604, 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (explaining that a timely filed rule 3.850 motion may be amended prior to the postconviction court’s disposition even after the two-year time period for filing a timely motion under the rule has expired).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Millette v. State, 176 So. 3d 1287, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16150, 2015 WL 6620177 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

176 So. 3d 1287 (Millette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosier v. State
144 So. 3d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Millette v. State
148 So. 3d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)