Millette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County)

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided April 9, 2025·No. 8:18-cv-02232·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION REYNALDO MILLETTE, Petitioner, Case No. 8:18-cv-2232-WFJ-NHA SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. / ORDER Before the Court is Mr. Millette’s Application for Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 57). The Application is DENIED because jurists of reason would not debate the denial of the habeas petition. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 326 (2003) (A certificate of appealability will be issued only if a petitioner demonstrates “that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.”). Mr. Millette is advised that he may seek a certificate of appealability from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals under Rule 22(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on April 9, 2025.

WILLIAM F. iS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Reynaldo Millette, pro se Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Millette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County), (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Millette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County) (Millette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)