Millervillage Chiropractic Center, A.P.C.C. v. Officemax North America, Inc.

4 So. 3d 849, 2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 1351, 2008 La. App. LEXIS 1735, 2008 WL 5351657
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 23, 2008
Docket2008 CA 1351
StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 3d 849 (Millervillage Chiropractic Center, A.P.C.C. v. Officemax North America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millervillage Chiropractic Center, A.P.C.C. v. Officemax North America, Inc., 4 So. 3d 849, 2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 1351, 2008 La. App. LEXIS 1735, 2008 WL 5351657 (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

CARTER, C.J.

This is a dispute between a medical provider and employer concerning payment of workers’ compensation benefits. Specifically, the medical provider, Millervillage Chiropractic Center, A.P.C.C. (“Millervil-lage”), filed a disputed claim for compensation alleging that the employer, OfficeMax North America, Inc. (“OfficeMax”), failed to make full and timely payments for medical services rendered to its injured employee. OfficeMax’s workers’ compensation insurer/administrator, Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. (“Gallagher Basset”), excepted to the subject matter jurisdiction of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (“OWC”), contending that its defense included the applicability of Preferred Provider Organization (“PPO”) contracts, which removed this dispute from the jurisdiction of the OWC. The OWC ultimately agreed with Gallagher Bassett, granted the exception, and dismissed the disputed claim. Millervillage now appeals.

In the case of Millervillage Chiropractic Center v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 08-1350 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/23/08), 4 So.3d 846, this court considered the jurisdiction of the OWC over such disputes. For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that the OWC does have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the claim presented herein. Accordingly, the judgment of the OWC is reversed and this matter is remanded for further proceedings. Costs of this appeal are assessed to OfficeMax North America, Inc., and Gallagher Bas-sett Services, Inc. This memorandum opin *850 ion is issued in compliance with URCA Rule 2-16.1.B.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Development Co. v. Greco
8 La. App. 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 So. 3d 849, 2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 1351, 2008 La. App. LEXIS 1735, 2008 WL 5351657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millervillage-chiropractic-center-apcc-v-officemax-north-america-lactapp-2008.