Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Murrell
367 S.W.2d 667
Opinion
We refuse, n. r. e., the writ applied for in this case, but our refusal is not to be construed as an approval of the Court of Civil Appeals holding, which is, in effect, that loss due to expansion of earth beneath the slab foundation house is not excluded by the terms of the insurance contract. 362 S.W.2d 868. This holding has not been attacked by point of error in petitioner’s application for writ of error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Murrell, 367 S.W.2d 667 (Tex. 1963).
367 S.W.2d 667 (Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Murrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City Of Burlington v. Indemnity Insurance Company Of North America
332 F.3d 38 (Second Circuit, 2003)
City of Burlington v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
332 F.3d 38 (Second Circuit, 2003)
New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Coffman
540 S.W.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)