Miller's Lessee v. Holt

1 Tenn. 242
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedSeptember 6, 1807
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 242 (Miller's Lessee v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller's Lessee v. Holt, 1 Tenn. 242 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1807).

Opinions

[S. C., ante, 49, 111; infra, 308.]
The plaintiff produced a grant dated October 25, 1802, upon a survey made February 12, 1801. The defendant deduced his title from a grant to King, thence through several conveyances to Andrew Jackson, and from Jackson, by Charles M'Clung, his attorney, to Holt the defendant, by deed dated the 11th day of July, 1801, which was acknowledged before a judge in November, 1806, and registered in May, 1807. It was stated by the plaintiff's counsel, that, at the time of the acknowledgment and registration of this deed, there was no law to authorize it, the act for prolonging the time of registration having expired previous to that time. The legislature of 1806 made no provision for prolonging the time as is usual. This deed cannot be read, as there was no law to authorize the probate and registration at the time it was done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Lessee of the Proprietary v. Ralston
1 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1773)
Phelps v. Sage
2 Day 151 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1805)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millers-lessee-v-holt-tennsuperct-1807.