Miller's Administrator v. Young

17 F. Cas. 365, 2 D.C. 53, 2 Cranch 53

Opinion

The Court,

however,

(Thruston, J., absent,)

had made up their opinion, that the statute against pretensed titles did not vacate the deed; and that the agreement to settle the account, being executed by a deed with general warranty, which was accepted by the plaintiff, the transaction was closed and could not be disaffirmed; and that the plaintiff must resort to his warranty..