Miller's Administrator v. Young
17 F. Cas. 365, 2 D.C. 53, 2 Cranch 53
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 17 F. Cas. 365 (Miller's Administrator v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Miller's Administrator v. Young, 17 F. Cas. 365, 2 D.C. 53, 2 Cranch 53 (circtddc 1812).
Opinion
however,
had made up their opinion, that the statute against pretensed titles did not vacate the deed; and that the agreement to settle the account, being executed by a deed with general warranty, which was accepted by the plaintiff, the transaction was closed and could not be disaffirmed; and that the plaintiff must resort to his warranty..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stewart v. Townsend
41 F. 121 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1890)
Bush v. Sproat
43 Ark. 416 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 365, 2 D.C. 53, 2 Cranch 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millers-administrator-v-young-circtddc-1812.