Miller v. Zeigler
163 F. 1022, 89 C.C.A. 664, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4603
Opinion
This case has been brought here by petition for revision, and the counsel for the petitioner have been fully heard thereon; but it is not confined to “matter of law.” It really presents complicated questions of fact, and for this reason cannot be entertained. Nothing is now decided with respect to any appeal which has been or may be taken; but it is clear that the present petition cannot be sustained, and therefore it is dismissed without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Zeigler, 163 F. 1022, 89 C.C.A. 664, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4603 (3d Cir. 1908).
163 F. 1022 (Miller v. Zeigler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.