Miller v. Yung

Eighth Circuit

Miller v. Yung

18 F. App'x 458

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 2001

DocketNo. 01-1717

StatusPublished

This text of 18 F. App'x 458 (Miller v. Yung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Yung, 18 F. App'x 458 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of himself and his minor child, Megan, appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal without prejudice of his lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record and appellants’ brief, we agree with the district court that it lacked [459]*459subject matter jurisdiction over Miller’s claims concerning child visitation. See Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 187, 108 S.Ct. 513, 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988); Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of himself and his minor child, Megan, appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal without prejudice of his lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record and appellants’ brief, we agree with the district court that it lacked [459]*459subject matter jurisdiction over Miller’s claims concerning child visitation. See Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 187, 108 S.Ct. 513, 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988); Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 F. App'x 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-yung-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack