Miller v. Yung

Eighth Circuit

Miller v. Yung

18 F. App'x 458

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2001·No. No. 01-1717·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of himself and his minor child, Megan, appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal without prejudice of his lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record and appellants’ brief, we agree with the district court that it lacked [459] subject matter jurisdiction over Miller’s claims concerning child visitation. See Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 187, 108 S.Ct. 513, 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988); Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of himself and his minor child, Megan, appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal without prejudice of his lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record and appellants’ brief, we agree with the district court that it lacked [459] subject matter jurisdiction over Miller’s claims concerning child visitation. See Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 187, 108 S.Ct. 513, 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988); Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Miller v. Yung, 18 F. App'x 458 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

18 F. App'x 458 (Miller v. Yung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related