Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2009
Docket09-6237
StatusUnpublished

This text of Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office (Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6237

JOHN ALAN MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

YORK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (2:08-cv-03834-JFA)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Alan Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Alan Miller appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. York

Cnty. Public Defenders Ofc., No. 2:08-cv-03834-JFA (D.S.C.

Dec. 31, 2008; filed Jan. 21, 2009 & entered Jan. 22, 2009). We

deny Miller’s motions for punitive damages, to impose sanctions,

to compel all information regarding Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S.

83 (1963), for transcript at government expense, for

intervention, and motion for judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-york-county-public-defenders-office-ca4-2009.