Miller v. Wybrants
This text of 2 Posey 409 (Miller v. Wybrants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion.— Our opinion is that there is no error in the judgment of the court below.
The assignments of error are so vague as not to indicate very definitely the grounds of this appeal.
Counsel for appellant suggest in their brief that the deed from Daniels and wife to Flowery did not pass title to the certificate by virtue of which the land was located. It should have been objected to when it was offered in evidence. Mrs. Daniels denied executing the deed, but this amounts to nothing. See Williams v. Powers, 48 Tex., 141; Hartley v. Frosh, 6 Tex., 108.
In our opinion the judgment should be affirmed, and it. is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Posey 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-wybrants-texcommnapp-1882.