Miller v. Weinstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Weinstock

10 A.D.2d 715, 198 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11446

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 715 (Miller v. Weinstock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Weinstock, 10 A.D.2d 715, 198 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for slander, the appeal is from an order granting a motion to dismiss the complaint for patent insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), with leave to replead. Order affirmed, without costs. Absent allegations of special damage, the complaint is defective (Gurtler v. Union Parts Mfg. Co., 1 N Y 2d 5). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for slander, the appeal is from an order granting a motion to dismiss the complaint for patent insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), with leave to replead. Order affirmed, without costs. Absent allegations of special damage, the complaint is defective (Gurtler v. Union Parts Mfg. Co., 1 N Y 2d 5). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 715, 198 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-weinstock-nyappdiv-1960.