Miller v. Warner

1 Brayt. 168
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1816·No. No. 2·Published

Opinion

ALTHOUGH it appears from the exceptions alloived and signed by the Judge, that the testimony was improperly admitted, by which a verdict was given for defendant: the Court will not set aside the verdict, provided the action is such as the plaintiff cannot sustain on legal principles.

An action of replevin, cannot be sustained, except under the Statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Warner, 1 Brayt. 168 (Vt. 1816).

1 Brayt. 168 (Miller v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.