Miller v. Wagner Equipment Company

• Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
• Decided: November 10, 2022
• Docket: 2:22-cv-00597
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL MILLER, Plaintiff, v. No. 22-cv-0597 KRS/SMV WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY and JAY HERR, Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff filed his Complaint in state court on March 1, 2022. [Doc. 1-1] at 3-4. Defendant Wagner Equipment Co. removed the action on August 11, 2022. [Doc. 1]. Plaintiff had 90 days from the date of removal, or until November 9, 2022, to effect service of process on Defendant Herr. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 44m) (2015) (providing 90 days for service); Wallace v. Microsoft Corp., 596 F.3d 703, 706 (10th Cir. 2010) (service time begins on date of removal). The 90 days have passed, and there is no indication on the record that service of process has been effected with respect to the Defendant Herr. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff show good cause why his claims against Defendant Herr should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the service provision of Rule 4(m). See Espinoza v. United States, 52 F.3d 838, 841 (10th Cir. 1995). Plaintiff must file his response no later than December 1, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED.

STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge