Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch

E.D. Texas

Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch

DecidedFebruary 3, 2021

Docket6:20-cv-00662

StatusUnknown

This text of Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch (Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch, (E.D. Tex. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

§ ROBERT MILLER, #866293, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 6:20-cv-662-JDK-KNM § UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL § BRANCH, et al., § § Defendants. § §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL On December 28, 2020, Plaintiff Robert Miller filed an original civil rights complaint initiating this action, but did not file an advanced written permission from a United States District Judge or Fifth Circuit Judge expressly authorizing the filing of this case or pay the applicable filing fee in full. On November 13, 2018, the Northern District of Texas barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action or lawsuit in that court or any other court unless he obtains advanced written permission from a United States District Judge or Fifth Circuit Judge expressly authorizing the filing of such law or civil action. Miller v. Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch Hosp., No. 6:18-cv-41-C, Docket No. 7 at 5 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2018). The Northern District Court further instructed Plaintiff that any request for permission to file a lawsuit must be accompanied by: (a) a proposed, completed complaint on the proper form, and (b) payment in full of the applicable filing fee. Id. Plaintiff was also warned that further frivolous or malicious filings could result in additional sanctions, including monetary sanctions. Id. Since the entry of that order, Plaintiff has had at least the following suits dismissed as barred: Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch, et al., No. 5:19-ev- 0012-C (N.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2019); Miller v. Bustos, No. 6:20-cv-167 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2020); and Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch, et al., No. 6:20-cv-223 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2020). Based on the Plaintiff's conduct before the Northern District of Texas and this Court, this Court adopted a similar restriction in a subsequent lawsuit by Plaintiff. Miller v. Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch, No. 6:20-cv-223, Docket No. 7 at 5 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2020). This Court is bound by the sanctions imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and honors sanctions imposed by other federal district courts in the State of Texas. See General Order No. 94-6 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 1994); Balawajder v. Scott, 160 F.3d 1066, 1068 (5th Cir. 1998) (explaining that a district court does not abuse its discretion in honoring sanctions imposed by other district courts). This Court takes the sanctions imposed by a sister district or court seriously and will not disregard a sanction that has been imposed. Here, Plaintiff did not present authorization from a district judge or the Fifth Circuit prior to filing this lawsuit. Further, he failed to pay the full filing fee of $400 with the filing of this suit. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as BARRED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8rd_ day of February, 2021. qe J Korb JHKREMYD. KERN DLE U ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

§ ROBERT MILLER, #866293, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 6:20-cv-662-JDK-KNM § UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL § BRANCH, et al., § § Defendants. § §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL On December 28, 2020, Plaintiff Robert Miller filed an original civil rights complaint initiating this action, but did not file an advanced written permission from a United States District Judge or Fifth Circuit Judge expressly authorizing the filing of this case or pay the applicable filing fee in full. On November 13, 2018, the Northern District of Texas barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action or lawsuit in that court or any other court unless he obtains advanced written permission from a United States District Judge or Fifth Circuit Judge expressly authorizing the filing of such law or civil action. Miller v. Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch Hosp., No. 6:18-cv-41-C, Docket No. 7 at 5 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2018). The Northern District Court further instructed Plaintiff that any request for permission to file a lawsuit must be accompanied by: (a) a proposed, completed complaint on the proper form, and (b) payment in full of the applicable filing fee. Id. Plaintiff was also warned that further frivolous or malicious filings could result in additional sanctions, including monetary sanctions. Id. Since the entry of that order, Plaintiff has had at least the following suits dismissed as barred: Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch, et al., No. 5:19-ev- 0012-C (N.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2019); Miller v. Bustos, No. 6:20-cv-167 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2020); and Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch, et al., No. 6:20-cv-223 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2020). Based on the Plaintiff's conduct before the Northern District of Texas and this Court, this Court adopted a similar restriction in a subsequent lawsuit by Plaintiff. Miller v. Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch, No. 6:20-cv-223, Docket No. 7 at 5 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2020). This Court is bound by the sanctions imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and honors sanctions imposed by other federal district courts in the State of Texas. See General Order No. 94-6 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 1994); Balawajder v. Scott, 160 F.3d 1066, 1068 (5th Cir. 1998) (explaining that a district court does not abuse its discretion in honoring sanctions imposed by other district courts). This Court takes the sanctions imposed by a sister district or court seriously and will not disregard a sanction that has been imposed. Here, Plaintiff did not present authorization from a district judge or the Fifth Circuit prior to filing this lawsuit. Further, he failed to pay the full filing fee of $400 with the filing of this suit. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as BARRED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8rd_ day of February, 2021. qe J Korb JHKREMYD. KERN DLE U ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-university-of-texas-medical-branch-txed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack