Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.

3 A.D.2d 905, 163 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5394

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 905 (Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Universal Pictures Co., 3 A.D.2d 905, 163 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of Special Term unanimously modified to provide for the examination of Messrs. Simonelli and Lipton in New York City at a time and place to be fixed in the order. The books and records available in New York City shall be produced pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act upon the examination. With respect to Messrs. Davis and Horton, plaintiff, if she be so advised, may move to obtain their testimony by way of interrogatories or open commission at her own expense in California. If they are so examined, the books and records available in California shall be produced at that time. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Special Term unanimously modified to provide for the examination of Messrs. Simonelli and Lipton in New York City at a time and place to be fixed in the order. The books and records available in New York City shall be produced pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act upon the examination. With respect to Messrs. Davis and Horton, plaintiff, if she be so advised, may move to obtain their testimony by way of interrogatories or open commission at her own expense in California. If they are so examined, the books and records available in California shall be produced at that time. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 905, 163 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-universal-pictures-co-nyappdiv-1957.