Miller v. United States

128 F. 469, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 29, 1904
DocketNo. 3,282
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 128 F. 469 (Miller v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. United States, 128 F. 469, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689 (circtsdny 1904).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

The tariff law provides for a duty of 15 per cent, ad valorem, by paragraph 396, for “printing paper, unsized, sized or glued, suitable for books and newspapers.” Act July 24, 1897, c. it, § t, Schedule M, 30 Stat. 187 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1671]. And by paragraph 401 of 15 per cent, ad valorem and 3j4 cents per pound for “writing, letter, note, hand-made, drawing, ledger, bond, record, tablet, and typewriter paper.” 30 Stat. 189 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1672]. This importation is of handmade printing paper suitable for books and newspapers. It was assessed under paragraph 401, against a protest that it should be assessed under paragraph 396. It comes exactly within the description of paragraph 396, as printing paper “suitable for books and newspapers,” although it is handmade. There are handmade writing papers which would undoubtedly come under paragraph 401, but this being printing paper specifically mentioned under paragraph 396 as suitable for books and news[470]*470papers, this latter seems to be the most specific provision. The paper provided for under paragraph 401 seems to be that which is surfaced suitably for being written upon, while that under paragraph 396 is wholly unsuitable for that purpose. The two paragraphs divide writing and printing paper into these two classes. This seems to fall, within the class provided for under paragraph 396. As there is handmade writing paper, the provision for handmade paper under paragraph 401 has something to apply to besides this handmade printing paper. This leads to the conclusion that the assessment under paragraph 401 should be reversed, and the assessment made under paragraph 396.

Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.
177 F. 371 (First Circuit, 1910)
Davies v. United States
172 F. 298 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1909)
United States v. Seyd
158 F. 408 (Second Circuit, 1907)
Edward Benneche & Bro. v. United States
153 F. 861 (Second Circuit, 1907)
Seyd v. United States
152 F. 657 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 F. 469, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-united-states-circtsdny-1904.