Miller v. United States
This text of Miller v. United States (Miller v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RUTH MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2015-5062 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:11-cv-00766-JFM, Senior Judge James F. Merow. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DONNA M. BURDYCK KING, Law Office of Donna M.B. King, LLC, Towson, MD, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
JANA MOSES, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Di- vision, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., REGINALD T. BLADES, JR. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Miller v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-united-states-cafc-2016.