Miller v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Miller v. United States

212 F.2d 809, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 419

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1954

DocketNos. 11986, 11987

StatusPublished

This text of 212 F.2d 809 (Miller v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. United States, 212 F.2d 809, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 419 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants in these consolidated appeals were jointly tried and convicted for violations of the lottery laws.¹ Their claims for reversal rest upon the contention that the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress certain evidence obtained by police in the course of executing warrants to search the premises of appellant Miller and for his arrest Appellants vigorously assert that the warrants were issued without sufficient probable cause.

We think the motions were properly denied. The convictions are therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants in these consolidated appeals were jointly tried and convicted for violations of the lottery laws.¹ Their claims for reversal rest upon the contention that the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress certain evidence obtained by police in the course of executing warrants to search the premises of appellant Miller and for his arrest Appellants vigorously assert that the warrants were issued without sufficient probable cause.

We think the motions were properly denied. The convictions are therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F.2d 809, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-united-states-cadc-1954.