Miller v. United States Attorney General
Opinion
Marshall Ray Miller, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. United States Attorney General, No. 3:08-cv-02806-TLW, 2008 WL 5244579 (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
325 F. App'x 252 (Miller v. United States Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.