Miller v. Union Traction Co.

48 A. 864, 198 Pa. 639, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 855
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 253·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The testimony in this ease did not warrant a charge of negligence against the defendant company, and therefore the court below did not err in entering the nonsuit and refusing to take it off. A reference to the testimony and to the decisions of this court in the following cases will show that the plaintiff’s claim had nothing tangible to support it: Smith v. O’Connor, 48 Pa. 218; Hestonville, etc., Pass. Railroad Co. v. Kelley, 102 Pa. 115; Chilton v. Central Traction Co., 152 Pa. 425; Funk v. Electric Traction Co., 175 Pa. 559; Kline v. Electric Traction Co., 181 Pa. 276; Gould v. Union Traction Co., 190 Pa. 198; Fletcher v. Scranton Traction Co., 185 Pa. 147.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Union Traction Co., 48 A. 864, 198 Pa. 639, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 855 (Pa. 1901).

48 A. 864 (Miller v. Union Traction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Myers v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
89 A. 577 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Corpies v. Sand Co.
31 Pa. Super. 107 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Keller v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
63 A. 413 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Sontgen v. Kittanning & Ford City Street Railway
62 A. 523 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
McKee v. Harrisburg Traction Co.
60 A. 498 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)