Miller v. Union Traction Co.
This text of 48 A. 864 (Miller v. Union Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony in this ease did not warrant a charge of negligence against the defendant company, and therefore the court below did not err in entering the nonsuit and refusing to take it off. A reference to the testimony and to the decisions of this court in the following cases will show that the plaintiff’s claim had nothing tangible to support it: Smith v. O’Connor, 48 Pa. 218; Hestonville, etc., Pass. Railroad Co. v. Kelley, 102 Pa. 115; Chilton v. Central Traction Co., 152 Pa. 425; Funk v. Electric Traction Co., 175 Pa. 559; Kline v. Electric Traction Co., 181 Pa. 276; Gould v. Union Traction Co., 190 Pa. 198; Fletcher v. Scranton Traction Co., 185 Pa. 147.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A. 864, 198 Pa. 639, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-union-traction-co-pa-1901.