Miller v. Traphagan

6 N.J. Eq. 200
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedJune 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J. Eq. 200 (Miller v. Traphagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Traphagan, 6 N.J. Eq. 200 (N.J. Ct. App. 1847).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

A notice to dissolve an injunction, “for irregularity in the proceedings” is insufficient.

The irregularity complained of should be stated in the notice. 2 Green’s, Ch. 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.J. Eq. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-traphagan-njch-1847.