Miller v. Stewart Warner Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Stewart Warner Corp.

255 A.D. 1010, 8 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6253

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1938·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution, order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, on authority of Di Bernardo v. Stewart Warner Corporation (ante, p. 1004), decided herewith. Plaintiffs may serve a new complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon if they be so advised. Lazansky, P. J., Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution, order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, on authority of Di Bernardo v. Stewart Warner Corporation (ante, p. 1004), decided herewith. Plaintiffs may serve a new complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon if they be so advised. Lazansky, P. J., Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Miller v. Stewart Warner Corp., 255 A.D. 1010, 8 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 1010 (Miller v. Stewart Warner Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.