Miller v. Stern

City of New York Municipal Court

Miller v. Stern

24 Misc. 769, 53 N.Y.S. 1109

DecidedAugust 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Misc. 769 (Miller v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Stern, 24 Misc. 769, 53 N.Y.S. 1109 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Schuchman, J.

In this case we see no reason to doubt that the jury have not done substantial justice between the parties, and if the remark of the trial justice was prejudicial, it was cured by his charge, which left the matter in difference very fairly to the jury.

The evidence as to what the defendant paid in supplying the defect of the goods was not prejudicial, for the jury made no allowance therefor in their verdict.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI