Miller v. State
204 N.W.2d 678, 57 Wis. 2d 768, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Wis. 2d 358 →
Opinion
The single issue raised on this review is whether the defendant’s claimed intoxication at the time of the offense was a defense to the charge of burglary. After a review of the record and in accordance with the test set forth in State v. Guiden (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 328, 174 N. W. 2d 488, the court concludes the defendant failed to establish he was intoxicated to the degree that he was utterly incapable of forming the intent requisite to the commission of the crime charged.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 204 N.W.2d 678, 57 Wis. 2d 768, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1608 (Wis. 1973).
204 N.W.2d 678 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Guiden
174 N.W.2d 488 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1970)