Miller v. State

256 S.W.2d 856, 158 Tex. Crim. 461, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1657
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 Tex. Crim. 389
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1953·No. No. 26,379·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for unlawfully hunting upon the inclosed lands of another, as prohibited by Art. 1377, Vernon’s P. C., as amended.

There is no testimony showing that the lands upon which the appellant was alleged to have unlawfully hunted were inclosed. The state’s witness testified that the lands consisted of agricultural and grazing lands. Such lands, however, must be inclosed, as that term is defined in the statute, in order for the statute to apply.

Because the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. •

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 256 S.W.2d 856, 158 Tex. Crim. 461, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1657 (Tex. 1953).

256 S.W.2d 856 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.