Miller v. State

95 S.W.2d 968, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Tex. Crim. 166
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 24, 1936·No. No. 18480·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violating a provision of the “Texas Liquor Control Act” passed by the 44th Legislature, 2d Called Session, chapter 467, p. 1795 (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.), and his punishment assessed at a fine of $400.

The prosecution was under subdivision (n) of section 15 of said act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 15, subd.(n). It was charged against appellant that he was the holder of a medicinal permit to sell liquor for medicinal purposes only, which permit had been issued by the Texas Liquor Control Board, and that appellant sold liquor to a named person without said person having a prescription for said liquor issued to him by a licensed practicing physician.

The record is here without bills of exception or statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 95 S.W.2d 968, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740 (Tex. 1936).

95 S.W.2d 968 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.